А вот тут люди говорят что в среднем жесткость Эйбахов ПроКит почти такая же или меньше чем у стока. Хотя в конечной точке сжатия они жестче. А говорят что типа лучше для жесткости брать H&R
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/hand...han-stock.html
1)
Acording to them, for our 2ga FWD cars, the spring rates for Proktis are progressive, and are:
Front
Initial 214
Final 319
Rear
Initial 114
Final 194
If you do the math, the average for the front is 266.5 (aaprox. equal to stock), and the rear is 154 (lower than stock).
This shocked me, because as far as I knew, Prokits were supposed to be stiffer than stock! Apparently, they're shorter, and equal in front stiffness while sofetr in the rear!
Thought everyone might like to know...
2)
I pulled some old numbers I had written down when I was searching for suspension. I'm not sure if these are final or inital, but I thought I would throw them out as reference since they so seem to match the 15-20% stiffer than stock claim of Eibachs (looking at final #s)
95-96 OEM Stock 2G AWD
Front: 265
Rear: 162 (+/- 8 )
97-99 OEM Stock 2G AWD
Front: 246
Rear: 151
95-96 OEM Stock 2G FWD
Front: 246
Rear: 173
97-99 OEM Stock 2G FWD
Front: 246
Rear: 151